Welcome to our

Cyber Security News Aggregator

.

Cyber Tzar

provide a

cyber security risk management

platform; including automated penetration tests and risk assesments culminating in a "cyber risk score" out of 1,000, just like a credit score.

Security businessman faces £4,500 court bill

published on 2022-11-07 14:29:05 UTC by Simon Finlay
Content:

A security business owner has been found guilty of failing to provide information to the industry authority.

The case against Usman Raees was heard in his absence at Braford Magistrates Court on November 1.

The court fined him £660 and ordered him to pay £3,814 court costs plus a £66 victim surcharge within 28 days for failing to provide information to the Security Industry Authority (SIA).

This week’s case follows a successful prosecution by the SIA in December 2020, when Mr Raees was prosecuted for failing to supply information to the SIA despite repeated requests.

An SIA statement said: “Mr Raees was the sole company director of Bluesec Services Group Ltd for a very short period at the end of November 2017.

“The SIA later received information about irregular company practices at Bluesec Services.

“The SIA sought further information from Mr Raees, who held a non front-line licence. SIA investigators wrote to Mr Raees on 16 September 2019 and sent subsequent follow-up letters to which he failed to respond.

“Early in 2021 Mr Raees claimed that he had just discovered that he had been prosecuted in his absence.

“He requested that his case be reopened. The case was heard on Tuesday, yet he once again failed to appear. In his continued absence, the court found him guilty and awarded the full costs to the SIA.”

Mark Chapman, one of the SIA’s criminal investigations managers, said: “This is the second time the court has found the case proven against Mr Raees.

“He is a former company director who now has a criminal record and is unlikely to ever hold an SIA licence again.

“The role of the SIA is to protect the public. We actively pursue investigations where there are suspicions that dubious practices are being carried out.

“Failure to supply information to our investigators when requested is an offence. As in this case such actions most often lead to prosecution. The fine and the costs reflect the view the court takes on a refusal to engage with the private security industry regulator.”

By law, security operatives working under contract must hold and display a valid SIA licence.

The offence relating to the Private Security Industry Act (2001) that is mentioned above is: section 19 – failing to provide information relating to an investigation

The Security Industry Authority is the organisation responsible for regulating the private security industry in the United Kingdom, reporting to the Home Secretary under the terms of the Private Security Industry Act 2001.

The SIA’s main duties are: the compulsory licensing of individuals undertaking designated activities; and managing the voluntary Approved Contractor Scheme.

Article: Security businessman faces £4,500 court bill - published about 2 years ago.

https://securityjournaluk.com/security-businessman-faces-4500-court-bill/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=security-businessman-faces-4500-court-bill   
Published: 2022 11 07 14:29:05
Received: 2022 11 07 14:46:20
Feed: Security Journal UK
Source: Security Journal UK
Category: Security
Topic: Security
Views: 2

Custom HTML Block

Click to Open Code Editor