Jason Brown, Commercial Director of Selectamark Security Systems, delves into the future of forensic science.

In October 2023, the forensic science community witnessed a significant milestone with the introduction of the Forensic Science Regulator’s new mandatory Code of Practice.  

This groundbreaking development marked a pivotal shift in the landscape of forensic science in England and Wales, particularly in its application to security and criminal justice. 

However, the implementation of this code, coupled with the necessity for companies providing forensic analytical reports into the Criminal Justice System to attain accreditation to ISO 17025:2017, stands out as a transformative move towards ensuring the quality, reliability and integrity of forensic evidence being delivered into this country’s criminal justice system. 

The new forensic landscape 

The introduction of the Forensic Science Regulator’s Code of Practice represents a response to the growing complexities of forensic science in security and criminal investigations.  

The Code aims to establish standardised practices, ensuring that all forensic processes, from the collection of evidence to its analysis and interpretation, are conducted with utmost precision, reliability and in accordance with the highest scientific standards. 

Central to this new era of forensic science is the requirement for laboratories and companies to achieve accreditation to ISO 17025:2017.

This international standard specifies the general requirements for the competence, impartiality and consistent operation of laboratories. 

In the context of forensic science, ISO 17025:2017 accreditation serves as a benchmark for technical proficiency, ensuring that the evidence handled by these laboratories is reliable and of the highest quality. This is crucial, given that the outcomes of forensic analysis can be determinative in the pursuit of justice. 

Compliance with the code of practice 

The Forensic Science Regulator’s Code of Practice, when read in conjunction with ISO 17025:2017, sets forth a comprehensive framework for forensic practice.

This framework not only encompasses the technical aspects of forensic analysis but also extends to ethical considerations, data integrity and the communication of forensic findings. 

Compliance with this code is not merely about adhering to a set of rules; it is about embedding a culture of excellence and integrity within the forensic community. 

Out of the 1,700 UKAS accredited testing laboratories in the UK, only 51 currently demonstrate compliance with the Code of Practice. Just over half are UK Police forces, with the remainder private forensic testing laboratories. 

With regards to requirements, Section 32 “Control of Data” in the new mandatory code, directly relates to information security, addressing critical aspects of data handling, protection and integrity within forensic laboratories.

The emphasis on information security is a direct response to the challenges highlighted by incidents like the high-profile ransomware attack on a very large UK Forensic Service Provider.  

These events underline the devastating impact of cybersecurity breaches on the criminal justice system.

Section 32 aims to mitigate these risks by setting out specific requirements for the secure management of forensic data, thereby safeguarding against unauthorised access, data corruption and loss. 

By mandating strict controls over data, including its encryption, access, storage and transfer, the code seeks to protect the integrity of forensic evidence.

This is crucial for maintaining the credibility of the criminal justice system and ensuring that convictions are based on reliable and accurately processed data. 

Impact on the Criminal Justice System 

The implications of these developments for the UK’s Criminal Justice System are profound.  

Forensic evidence has always been a cornerstone of criminal investigations and legal proceedings.  

The enhanced rigour and standardisation brought about by the new Code of Practice and ISO 17025:2017 accreditation mean that the evidence presented in court should now be more robust and reliable than ever before.

This not only aids in the delivery of justice but also bolsters public confidence in the criminal justice system. 

For many forensic service providers, the transition involves a very significant investment in training, equipment and process optimisation, as well as the costs of achieving and maintaining accreditation which runs into the tens of thousands of pounds for even the smallest labs.  

However, these challenges are outweighed by the opportunities that arise from such compliance.

Accredited laboratories are recognised for their commitment to quality, increasing their credibility and opening doors to wider collaboration with law enforcement agencies and other stakeholders. 

The role of technology 

Advancements in technology have always been a driving force in forensic science.

The current era is no different.

Cutting-edge technologies like next-generation sequencing, digital forensics and AI-assisted analysis are redefining what is possible in forensic investigations.  

These technologies, when applied within the framework of the new Code of Practice and ISO standards, enhance the capacity of forensic scientists to derive accurate and insightful conclusions from evidence. 

An often-overlooked aspect of maintaining high forensic standards is the role of education and continuous learning.  

Forensic professionals must be abreast of the latest scientific developments, techniques and ethical standards.

Regular training and professional development are essential in ensuring that forensic practitioners are equipped to meet the demands of their roles within the evolving landscape of forensic science. 

The introduction of the Forensic Science Regulator’s Code of Practice and the emphasis on ISO 17025:2017 accreditation have also fostered a culture of collaboration and sharing of best practices within the forensic community.  

This collaboration extends beyond national borders, as forensic scientists worldwide strive to enhance the quality and reliability of their work. 

Looking ahead 

As we look to the future, the role of forensic science in security and the criminal justice system will only grow in importance.  

The standards set by the Forensic Science Regulator’s Code of Practice and ISO 17025:2017 accreditation will continue to evolve, reflecting advancements in science and technology and the changing needs of society.  

It is incumbent upon forensic professionals and the institutions they serve to remain committed to these standards, ensuring that the pursuit of justice is underpinned by the highest levels of scientific rigor and integrity. 

In conclusion, the introduction of the Forensic Science Regulator’s Code of Practice and the requirement for ISO 17025:2017 accreditation represent a watershed moment in the field of forensic science and data security will become an ever more important part of ensuring that convictions are based on reliable and accurately processed data. 

This article was originally published in the July Edition of Security Journal UK. To read your FREE digital edition, click here.